Book: Midnight Covenant by Amelia West
Reviewed by Books and Bad Ideas (Jamie)
Rating: 3/5
šš¦š¢š³šµ š±š°š¶šÆš„šŖšÆšØ, ššŖšÆš¢ š°š±š¦šÆš¦š„ šµš©š¦ š¦šÆš·š¦šš°š±š¦. ššÆš°šµš©š¦š³ š³š¢šŖšÆš„š³š°š± šš¢šÆš„š¦š„ š°šÆ šµš©š¦ š£š¢š¤š¬ š°š§ š©š¦š³ š©š¢šÆš„, š¢šÆš„ š“š©š¦ š“šøšŖš±š¦š„ šŖšµ š¢šØš¢šŖšÆš“šµ š©š¦š³ š£šš¢š¤š¬ š„š³š¦š“š“ š£š¦š§š°š³š¦ š±š¶šššŖšÆšØ šµš©š¦ šš¦šµšµš¦š³ š§š³š°š® šµš©š¦ š¦šÆš·š¦šš°š±š¦. šš©š¦ šØš³š¢š“š±š¦š„ šŖšµ š£š¦šµšøš¦š¦šÆ š“š©š¢š¬šŖšÆšØ š§šŖšÆšØš¦š³šµšŖš±š“, š©š¦š³ š¦šŗš¦š“ š“š¬šŖš®š®šŖšÆšØ šµš©š¦ š§š¢š®šŖššŖš¢š³ š“š¤š³šŖš±šµ š°š§ š©š¦š³ š§š¢šµš©š¦š³'š“ š©š¢šÆš„.
ššµ šøš¢š“ š¢š„š„š³š¦š“š“š¦š„ šµš° š©š¦š³, š¢šÆš„ šøš©š¦šÆ šµš©š¦ š®š¦š¢šÆšŖšÆšØ š°š§ šµš©š¦ šøš°š³š„š“ š“š¢šÆš¬ šŖšÆ, š“š©š¦ š§š¦ššµ š“š¶š„š„š¦šÆššŗ ššŖšØš©šµš©š¦š¢š„š¦š„.
Thank you to the author for the chance to ARC review this title.
Midnight Covenant by Amelie West is book one in a duology retelling of Bram Stoker's Dracula. Set up as a dark romantasy that places Mina Murray at the center of the Dracula tale, Midnight Covenant looks at what the story would be like if Mina, instead of Jonathan, had been left in Transylvania, alone with the Count among the foreboding mountains and dangerous creatures-- including her new husband.
Those of you who know me, know that I am passionate about two things in academia: the 19th century and monsters. I taught Dracula to my undergraduates when I was teaching intro to composition courses-- both the Francis Ford Coppola movie and the original novel-- and have a deep love for it myself because it is among the original western vampire novels. As such, I probably wasn't the ideal reader for this novel, if we're being honest with one another. I know the novel well. I've written about it, talked about it, studied it relentlessly... And retellings are usually more enjoyed by those with a casual appreciation for a text rather than a career-focused near-obsession with it.
Even if I were to remove the fervor of my love for Dracula by Stoker, this book felt largely derivative in a way that did not feel welcoming and interesting, but rather kind of flat and a bit boring. Even if the novel was meant to draw more from the source text of Dracula, I could see the influences of the film on the way that certain characters-- Mina and Lucy in particular-- talked. Winona Ryder's Mina said "of course" like it was the only thing she was scripted as being allowed to say. In addition to this, the book took all of Mina's badassery and made it into something less impressive. Mina Murray in Stoker's novel is ahead of her time-- a proto-feminist. She knows how to use a typewriter and is the sole reason the reader has the text of Dracula in their hands. She is the one who compiles the heroic narratives into a cohesive whole-- not her husband, not Dr. Seward, not Lord Arthur Holmwood. So for her to be poised to be this hero and to still need rescuing by men was a big let down. I was hoping for more from this version of Mina.
Beyond this issue, it was interesting to see how the narrative changed in making Mina into the direct protagonist, rather than a side story that occurs only due to her connections to Jonathan Harker. Unlike the romance in the movie, the Count in this rendition only appears charming and kind in order to gaslight Mina into believing that she can't trust her own mind. While I was hoping for a different kind of antagonist that did not rely on old stereotypes of foreigners as a threat-- a very British Gothic kind of trope-- I could have been on board with the Count remaining the villain if we had spent more time with him. As it stands, he was a very absent kind of villain. He's bad because we're told he's bad and then he does a few very sudden, cruel things in view of Mina to convince her that he's both evil and in total control.
If you love Dracula and aren't married to the idea of every FMC needing to be a badass, then I would consider picking up this book. It's a relatively short read and you may find it enjoyable.